Teachers: At what are you an expert?

This is the second in a series of reflections that came out of a fantastic sit-down with #MichED -ucators Melody Arabo (@melodyarabo) and Jeremy Tuller (@jertuller). Melody asked a question that followed up by mentioning that teachers have a really, really hard time answering: What parts of your professional work would you consider yourself to be an expert?

You see, the teaching profession makes it’s members uneasy by self-promotion. And it’s understandable. Teaching is a complex skill set. Teachers are renowned for having very, very broad sets of abilities as posters like this indicate:

Just a teacher

Technology adds even more lines to this poster. So, with so many different nooks and angles to the work, it can be very understandable that teaching is a profession that makes it’s practitioners feel as though their efforts are stretched a mile wide and an inch thick. It’s hard to feel like an expert at anything under those circumstances.

But we need to. We need our expert teachers to not only be aware of their areas of expertise, but also be willing to advertise it. There’s a lot of teachers in this state. Lots. Like… tens of thousands. It shouldn’t scandalize us that each teacher has strengths and weaknesses. And some teachers have lots and lots of strengths. Every profession has it’s hall-of-famers. I could name a few that I’d nominate for a public school teaching hall-of-fame. Duane Seastrom… Eileen Slider… (Did you just think of a couple that you’d nominate?)

And teachers have a darn good perspective on this. They know who the good ones are and what they are so good at. “Kids never act out for her.” “The projects they do for him are amazing.” “She gets amazing growth out of students with disabilities.” But chances are, those teachers aren’t blogging about it. Chances are they don’t have business cards that say, “Mrs. Taylor, instructional designer, classroom manager.” Chances are they aren’t promoting the practices that they use that work. Chances are they aren’t standing up in staff meetings showing 5-min video clips of the awesome things their students are doing. Because teachers don’t do that.

What is it about teaching that makes it’s practitioners uncomfortable declaring their strengths and advertising them?

I have my own half-baked ideas. (Comment opportunities for dissent, if you’re in the mood.) For one, teacher evaluations are really time-consuming and we really haven’t figured out how to do it yet. What are the best practices? How important is student achievement? How do you measure positive impact of a teacher on an unsuccessful student? These are really, really tough things to measure. This is a symptom of our inability to collectively agree on the exact role that the teacher plays in the education industry. I can all think of the teacher whose in-class practice is pretty good, but it completely uninvolved in the community. I can also think of teachers whose instructional and assessment practices aren’t stellar, but they do a wonderful, wonderful job of reaching out to the marginalized students and keep them coming to school. I can also think of teachers who are inept in supporting the struggling students in their classroom, but because they coach three sports help keep an different population of struggling students eligible so that they can stay active on their teams. All three of those teachers are playing roles that are tough to evaluate. Obviously, we want every teacher to be hall-of-fame quality at instruction and assessment, but how do you isolate the “mandatory” skill set?

From the other side, collective bargaining has put pressure on teachers to not really separate themselves in any major way. If we find ourselves with a handful of teachers who are exemplary teachers, it’s very short logical leap to those teachers deserving some sort of reward for being so good at what they do. Naturally, there’s a very reasonable desire on a whole lot of different levels to shield the teaching profession from this. We want this field to become more collaborative. Not more competitive. So, to protect against that the unions have stayed far, far away from emphasizing outspoken greatness of individual teachers.

That doesn’t mean that greatness doesn’t exist. It just means that greatness is staying contained. We don’t want that. We want greatness to spread. And given the technology, given the pressure, given the difficulty of being a teacher, it is becoming more and more reasonable for teachers to begin identifying the exemplary practitioners and trying to figure out what of their skills can be displayed and transferred.

There are three things that I believe to be true. 1. It’s possible for every teacher to be a great teacher. 2. Not every teacher is currently a great teacher. And 3. It is in the best interest of every student in America to be in the classroom of a great teacher just as often as possible.

So, I’ll ask again: What parts of your professional practice would you consider yourself to be an expert at? What do you do really, really well that you could demonstrate to mentor up a young or struggling teacher? What are the things you do that are so good that you’d be willing to share them on the open educational marketplace of ideas? Feel free to reply in the comments section. That way if you have a weakness in the area that matches with a person’s stated strength, you can reach out to them and open that conversation.

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “Teachers: At what are you an expert?

  1. Andrew,
    I love your last two posts. Educational leadership from the classroom teacher lens something I have really found myself drawn two these past few years. To piggyback off of your thoughts about teachers not promoting themselves very well, I think too often many teachers are uncomfortable even leaving their door open while class is in session – much less openly share about the potentially awesome things happening in their classroom. In the past 5 years, with the explosion of math blogs and online shared resources, we now have many more opportunities as teachers to share best lessons, activities, and resources.

    Also, I believe that the skill set required to be an expert teacher continually changes due to a number of variables such as new research about best practice, new technology, and new standards. A teacher who was “hall of fame” quality in 1995 may not be a very effective teacher in today’s classroom. Teachers must be actively looking to improve their practice.

    However, I do feel there certain qualities that all highly effective teachers possess that stand the test of time.

    Again, I love your recent posts. I feel I am an expert in integrating technology into my HS math classroom. I am more than willing to share thoughts and ideas with others.

    • Appreciate the kind words. That is an interesting parallel mentioning that teachers don’t like to even have their doors open. I hadn’t thought of that. (I liked to keep my door shut but that was because according to my neighbor teachers I have a very, very loud voice.)

      I would agree with you that while the work has changed quite a bit in recent decades, the skill set to exemplary teaching has built on a fairly consistent framework for a while now. Tight meaningful learning goals, a strong familiarity with the students current status and what they’ll need to learn, an effective and efficient formative assessment/feedback model, effective practices surrounding summative assessment is a winning combination no matter where it’s applied.

  2. Why do you believe #1? i.e., “It’s possible for every teacher to be a great teacher.”

    Is it possible for every surgeon to be a great surgeon?
    For every basketball player to be a great basketball player?
    For every painter to be a great painter?

    I can accept the above only by allowing for a very wide conception of “possibility.” Maybe it is possible that I could have been a great stone sculptor; but it is well outside of my bailiwick (and, frankly, I don’t have the internal drive to change this).

    More realistically: I think that the belief that every teacher can be a great teacher is a well-intentioned idea that doesn’t quite ring true. And, to some extent, a belief that undermines the work teachers do.

    To my eye, a more accurate statement would be: People who are willing to work hard to improve their teaching can become better teachers; people who are willing to work very hard to improve their teaching can become much better teachers.

    • I suppose I believe that the qualities, practices, and skills of great teaching are transferrable to practically anyone who meets the requirements of earning a teaching job. That doesn’t mean that every teacher has the energy, time, or inclination to do what it takes to improve, but I have yet to meet a teacher I felt was incapable of improvement.

      And while I can appreciate that, statistically-speaking, 50ish% of surgeons are below average, I’d like to think that the variance is extremely small and that the average proficiency level is really, really high. This keeps open the possibility that practically every surgeon is a great surgeon.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s