Sky Dive Trampoline: Real or Fake?

It has been a while since I’ve posted an additional installment to my “Real or Fake” Collection, but when I see videos like this, I just wonder what everyone else sees when they watch it.

So, a man jumps out of a plane at several thousand feet with no parachute and slips through a 3 x 5 hole in the roof of a warehouse to land on a trampoline where a crowd of perhaps 100 wait to celebrate his victorious descent.

If this is a hoax, the sell job is pretty elaborate: the tech team on the in the control room, the steering device, the slow-motion replay… It sells well. I suppose that is why the video went viral.

But I’m not sold.

First, this stunt is awfully high-risk. Like, it either works, or the stunt man isn’t getting up.

Second, no rehearsal for this technology that is probably seriously tricky to get right. I suspect this guy would have wanted to see a trial drop with a test dummy at least once before he jumps.

I envision that first test drop going sort of like this:

Third, can some of my physics friends verify my skepticism over the meager bounce the man shows once he lands? One minute at free fall? That’s a lot of kinetic energy. A lot. That’s all I’m saying.


All right, your turn.


What do you think? Real or fake?


If you are curious, here are my other posts in the “Real or Fake” collection.

Life-Saving Baseball Catch

Ski Jump Luge

Regarding Blended Learning

Is “blended learning” a trend?

I think it would be easy to call “blended learning” a trend. It seems to be rather popular in education right now. There are lots of grants available to support it. Instructional technology is a common talking point among reformers. Many teachers in many schools are experimenting with it, some with fantastic results. Others with frustration.

Blended Learning has been on my mind recently as it has become the current focus of my professional work. And to answer my opening question, for some, I suspect it is a trend. Write a grant, get some cash, buy some tech, generate some buzz. That’s how you take advantage of a trend. But for some, there might be more there. The reason that I have a hard time calling blending learning a trend or a fad is because of what is driving it. Or should be.

For many, myself included, it is being driven by an appreciation for the educational opportunities that in the internet provides that aren’t nearly as available without the internet. Flipping classes, collaboration, cross-curricular projects, etc — this stuff existed prior to the internet. But never have those tools been so available and so easy to implement and adapt.

So, will it work?

That completely depends on whether or not we are prepared to allow blended models to address our most pressing issues. I’ve written about this before. Blended learning is no magic bullet. Blended learning is an opportunity. Nothing more or less. It can be capitalized upon or it can be wasted. As with all opportunities, in order to take advantage of it, you need to be waiting for it. You need to be expecting it. You need to know why you are looking for it and what you expect to be able to use it for.

Because make no mistake, underperforming students and schools aren’t underperforming BECAUSE the students haven’t been using the internet. Therefore, simply involving the internet in their schooling isn’t a meaningful end. Blended learning is a how, it’s a means. A means to what?



At this point, I’m going to shout out to Simon Sinek, whose TED talk I recently saw. There were some quotes in this that I really liked. For example:

“But very, very few people or organizations know why they do what they do. And by “why”, I don’t mean “to make a profit.” That’s a result. It’s always a result. By “why”, I mean, what’s your purpose? What’s your cause? What’s your belief?”

When I heard that portion of the talk, I replaced “to make a profit” with “to improve student achievement.” Re-read the quote with that update. Improving student achievement shouldn’t be a why. It should be a result. What is our compelling “why”? Why should we blend offline and online resources to create a new educational model? What is the value the model? What transformation are we trying to create? Why will our students have access to a more powerful experience because of it?

The “whys” that we choose will drive our ability to create blended learning opportunities that have value instead of those that are blended because that is what folks are doing these days. They will energize us when our work exhausts us. They will help us to motivate our students when they (and perhaps we) are tempted to think that engaging a new learning opportunity is too much work. Those moments are real. And when it comes time to push through them, it isn’t the “what” that inspires.

It’s the why.

I suspect there will be teachers and schools that implement blended learning with fantastic results. I also suspect there will be teachers and schools that will implement blended learning and be very disappointed. It will depend completely on the “why” at the center of the golden circle. What will separate the two is the effort and energy spent developing the why.

And it begins with conversations like this: “I think we should start to implement blended learning.”

“Oh yeah? Why?”

A few words about failure…

I just finished up a day on campus at Michigan State University attending the Michigan Virtual University Symposium. It was a daylong set of discussions and panels dedicated to blended and online learning.

There were a lot of interesting discussion points to be sure, but the one that is going to stick with me the longest is, perhaps, the one that we try the hardest to forget:


Toward the end of the day, in the final panel discussion, the value of failure came out multiple times. The process of learning REQUIRES a certain amount of failure. Failure lets us know that we are pushing ourselves to grow. Failure is a sign that we are trying to put new understanding into practice. Failure gives use opportunities to check our progress toward a goal that sits out in front of us… a goal we haven’t reached yet, but continue to reach for.

We should fail sometimes and our students should see us do it. If we are really trying to show our students that we are lifelong learners, then we need to show our students what learning really looks like.

Many, many students are under the unfortunate impression that failing is something that weak students do and succeeding something that strong students do. While, the latter is certainly true, the former is certainly not.

Failing is something that happens with practically each first try at a new skill. Failing is something that is a natural part of the learning process. It is natural and it is helpful.

I am not sure this education system of ours is encouraging that fact – not of its administrators, teachers, or students. We expect progress now. We expect implementation to demonstrate immediate results. We want our teachers to teach in such a way that our students don’t get wrong answers.

Perhaps what we need to do is get back to the basics of learning. If at first you don’t succeed, try, try again.

From Geometry to Instructional Tech: A New Adventure

2014-09-10 11.30.43

This month, my journey in education takes a turn in a new direction. Thus far, all of my experience in education has been directly working with students, both teaching and coaching. (Well, with the exception of a short stint as a night custodian at a middle school when I was a freshman in college.) Teaching is a role that I have grown quite comfortable, but sometimes opportunities come along that give you a reason to consider other options.

So I will be leaving the classroom. I’ll be heading to join an exciting team (headlined by @HeidiGascon and @t_becker10) a few miles south of my house. I will be asked to specialize in instructional technology. I do not consider myself an expert in this field. I will be asking for lots and lots of help from all of you. In addition to learning and growing in my knowledge of instructional technology, I will be asked to explore (and provide insight) on the whole spectrum of k-12 instruction… all grades and all subjects. I will be asking for lots and lots of help from all of you in this, too. There are some excellent opportunities for personal growth in this new role and as you all have helped me grow into my role as a math teacher, I wonder if you’d continue to help me grow into my new role as a specialist in instructional technology.

My goal is to continue this blog. I would love to continue to discuss math, instruction, assessment, and learning with you. It’s been great so far. I am sure that I’ll be offering other insights and seeking other types of discussions as well. I look forward to where this is going to take us as a community.