In keeping with the theme du jour, I have added a second version of the Ritz Cracker problem which adds in a different element to the problem.
But, in my attempt to add a Dan Meyer-ness to the problem, I am only revealing Act I.
After watching, I want you to note any observations or questions in the comments below. What math could you do with this video? What information do you have can you pull from the video or from your real life experiences? What information would you need to go further?
Discuss in the comments.